Maximizing Captial Efficiency: Is global R&D one of the solutions?

I attended the SDForum Quarterly Venture Breakfast with PWC yesterday and there was a lot of talk about capital efficiency from the VC panel. Capital efficiency is nothing new, but under the current economic scenario all the VCs seem to be chanting the same mantra all of a sudden.

There was a recent popular blog post by Fred Wilson, a VC and principal of Union Square Ventures titled Capital Efficiency Finds Its Moment that brings this into spotlight. He says:

When capital is scarce, smart people figure out how to do more with less.

This is really what most all technology executives are trying to figure out today. It is really about how to think long term, how to ride out the downturn, but at the same time come out at the other end with innovative products in the marketplace that will not only ensure your company’s survival but help establish you as the leader.

Globalization of your engineering organization could be one of the ways to achieve capital efficiency. This is nothing new, everyone is familiar with engineering outsourcing and offshoring. But the key question is how efficient is your global engineering organization. Be it engineering outsourcing through a partner or your own captive centers, are you acheiving the desired results? Are you attaining the innovation and performance that a local team would have brought vs going offshore?

My take is that you should consider your global engineering initiatives very carefully. It is not about cost/resource/year but performance and outcomes. Do not setup or expand your captive or outsourcing partnership if the outcomes are not guaranteed.

The (in)famous RIP ppt from Sequoia Capital on startups & economic downturn

Sequoia Capital, arguably the smartest venture capital investor in business, is sounding the alarm and asking its portfolio companies to buckle down for what could be the worst economic downturn of their relatively short lives. read the story at GigaOM.

The now infamous ppt:

Global Software Engineering: Benefits of Outsourcing

One of the things that I try to tell folks who are interested in doing software product engineering globally is to consider the well established benefits outsourcing can bring to the table in conjunction with own teams local & global.

In this context I came across this article titled “Leveling the Developer Field” by Michael Vizard that talks about the evolving dynamics of global software engineering.

We are going to see a more nuanced approach to developing software on a global scale. It may cost less to develop software locally, but that does not mean there will be a movement of software development back to the U.S. Competitive factors such as total project cost, domain expertise and the quality of software will be the driving forces in software projects regardless of location.

The article also shares the experiences of one of Symphony’s customers on US vs offshore captive vs outsourcing partners.

Eaves says that Misys’ software development teams, especially in India, are almost always less expensive than hiring outside contractors. But what has happened over the years is that software development contractors in India have developed best practices that usually result in them delivering software that is of higher quality than what the internal teams can develop.

Read more: http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/IT-Management/Leveling-the-Developer-Field/